2022-cv-04906

2022-cv-04906 Phillips v. G. Pitchford et al

Date :12/12/2022
Court :Northen District of Illinois
Law FirmSLADKUS LAW

#

Date

Document

3

Sept. 12, 2022

APPLICATION by Plaintiff Darius Phillips for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments)

8

Nov. 16, 2022

ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [3] because it is incomplete. Plaintiff must either (1) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00 or (2) submit a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis thatcomplies with the instructions in this order. Failure to fully comply by December 9, 2022, will result in summary dismissal of this lawsuit. The Court defers consideration of Plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. � 1915A until after his fee status has been resolved. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/16/2022. Mailed notice

9

Dec. 8, 2022

APPLICATION by Plaintiff Darius Phillips for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits)

10

Jan. 31, 2023

ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [9]. Plaintiff must pay the $402.00 filing fee. He may pay by check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. He should mail payment to Clerk, United States District Court, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, attn: Cashier's Desk. Failure to pay by March 3, 2023 will result in dismissal of this lawsuit. The Court defers initial review of Plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. � 1915A until after he has paid the filing fee. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/31/2023. Mailed notice

12

March 8, 2023

COMPLAINT filed by Darius Phillips. (Exhibits)

13

April 13, 2023

ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice

14

April 13, 2023

ORDER: The Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint [12] as frivolous. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff challenging, before a proper tribunal, the procedures used to revoke his parole. But any claim under 42 U.S.C. � 1983 concerning his parole revocation hearings is legally frivolous so long as he remains incarcerated as a result of the hearings. The dismissal therefore counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. � 1915(g). The Clerk shall enter final judgment of dismissal. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 4/13/2023. Mailed notice.

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2