2025-cv-06898

COMPLAINT filed by DreamWorks Animation LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23655065.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 1

(Exhibit 1)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2

MOTION by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC for leave to file under seal

Exhibit 3

CIVIL Cover Sheet

Exhibit 4

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by DreamWorks Animation LLC

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by DreamWorks Animation LLC

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC by Justin R. Gaudio

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC by Berel Yonathan Lakovitsky

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC by Luana Faria De Souza (Faria De Souza, Luana)

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court grants the motion to seal [3], but upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining more than 90 defendants in a single action. By July 2, 2025, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by July 2, 2025 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice.

Supplemental Memorandum in Response to Minute Order [14] by DreamWorks Animation LLC

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding other[15]

MOTION by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

MEMORANDUM by DreamWorks Animation LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order[17]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[18]

DECLARATION of Monique Cheng Joe regarding memorandum in support of motion[18]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC Exhibit 3 - Parts 1-2 regarding declaration[20]

MOTION by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by DreamWorks Animation LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[22]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[23]

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC Schedule A Template

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder [Dkt. 15] and determines, within its discretion, that it has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 90 defendants is proper in this matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the Court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. The Court is not persuaded that any one defendant's infringement is linked to the next defendant's infringement sufficient to show they are part of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences as required by Rule 20. Even if the Court were mistaken in its joinder analysis, the Court exercises its discretion to not permit joinder in this case. See Dorsey v. Varga, 55 F.4th 1094, 110204 (7th Cir. 2022). Joining this many defendants in one case simply will not promote judicial economy. See Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189 ("[P]resenting dozens or hundreds of defendants in one lawsuit actually undermines judicial economy, because this Court must evaluate the evidence submitted in support of liability and, eventually, damages. That is especially true in the ex parte setting of a temporary restraining order, as well as for default-judgment motions."); Art Ask Agency, 2021 WL 5493226, at *3 (rejecting joinder of 216 defendants, noting that "joinder in this case may yield significant financial benefits to [the plaintiff] at the judiciary's expense.") Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint consistent with this order along with an amended Schedule A by no later than July 3, 2025. The remaining motions [17] and [22] are denied without prejudice to refiling. Mailed notice.

AMENDED complaint by DreamWorks Animation LLC against clothesman and the Individuals and Entities Operating clothesman and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint, [27]

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff can proceed on its amended complaint. Any motion for electronic service of process or request for early discovery should be filed by July 8, 2025. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC for discovery Expedited

MOTION by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by DreamWorks Animation LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[31]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[32]

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for expedited discovery and for electronic service [30] [31] are granted. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice.

ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 7/9/2025. Mailed notice.

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) clothesman and the Individuals and Entities Operating clothesman by Plaintiff DreamWorks Animation LLC

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant clothesman and the Individuals and Entities Operating clothesman

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DreamWorks Animation LLC as to clothesman and the Individuals and Entities Operating clothesman

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Pursuant to the voluntary dismissal 38 the case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.