# |
Date |
Document |
---|---|---|
1 |
Aug. 20, 2025 |
COMPLAINT filed by Fendi S.R.L.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23918201. Exhibit 1 to the Complaint Exhibit 2 to the Complaint Exhibit 3 to the Complaint Exhibit 4 to the Complaint |
8 |
Aug. 20, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. to seal Schedule A, Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert, and Plaintiffs Memorandum Establishing That Joinder Is Proper |
13 |
Aug. 20, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L.for electronic service of process. |
14 |
Aug. 20, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. for temporary restraining order |
19 |
Aug. 29, 2025 |
ORDER: A joint initial status report is due on or before October 29, 2025. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with Judge Gottschall's case procedures, which are available from the court's website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. To locate the case procedures, Follow the "judges" link, and select "Hon. Joan B. Gottschall." Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within fourteen days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement before filing the joint initial status report. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 8/29/2025. Mailed notice |
20 |
Aug. 29, 2025 |
STANDING ORDER IN "SCHEDULE A" CASES Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 8/29/2025. Mailed notice |
21 |
Aug. 29, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's motion [8] to seal filed August 20, 2025, is granted. The Clerk is instructed to maintain the seal on all presently sealed documents until further order of court. This order does not authorize plaintiff to file any future documents under seal. Plaintiff must show good cause under Local Rule 26.2(c) to file future documents, if any, under seal. While allegations made upon information and belief sometimes make out a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction at the pleading stage, see, e.g., JT's Frames, Inc. v. Casares, 2018 WL 835225, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 13, 2018), Lambert's conclusory averment fails to do so in the context of this case because the conclusory averment supporting personal jurisdiction is contradicted by the accompanying screenshots. Mailed notice |
23 |
Sept. 1, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. to seal Declaration of Mitesh Chauhan regarding Test Purchases and Personal Jurisdiction |
25 |
Sept. 2, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The motion for leave to file under seal [23] is granted. The Clerk is instructed to maintain the seal on all presently sealed documents. Mailed notice |
26 |
Sept. 3, 2025 |
ORDER: In accordance with the accompanying order, plaintiff's motion [14] for a temporary restraining order is denied without prejudice for want of a meaningful, fact-specific analysis of infringement. Plaintiff's motion [13] for leave to serve process electronically is denied without prejudice as premature. Plaintiff may renew its motion for leave to serve process electronically after it has propounded discovery to third parties providing services to defendants. If it wishes to do so, plaintiff has until and including September 17, 2025, to file a memorandum analyzing the propriety of joinder in a defendant-by-defendant manner and cite the page(s) in the record that individually support its contentions as to each individual defendant. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/3/2025.Mailed notice |