2025-cv-11812

2025-cv-11812 GT LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A

Date :9/29/2025
Court :Northen District of Illinois
Law FirmFlener

#

Date

Document

1

Sept. 29, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by GT LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24123588.

Schedule A

Ex.1

Ex.2

Ex.3

2

Sept. 29, 2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet

3

Sept. 29, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GT LLC by James Edward Judge

4

Sept. 29, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff GT LLC for leave to file documents under seal

Sept. 29, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

5

Sept. 29, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff GT LLC Unredacted Complaint

6

Sept. 30, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff's motion to seal [4] is denied. "The court may for good cause shown enter an order directing that one or more documents be filed under seal." L.R. 26.2(b). "[A] district court must be sensitive to the rights of the public in determining whether any particular document, or class of documents, is appropriately filed under seal." United States v. Corbitt, 879 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir. 1989). Here, the plaintiff seeks to file the complaint and the defendant's names under seal because the plaintiff claims that, were the defendants to learn of these proceedings, "the likely result would be the destruction of relevant documentary evidence and the concealment or transfer of assets to foreign jurisdictions." The plaintiff offers no evidentiary support for these conclusory assertions. Further, the plaintiff seeks to seal documents that it has yet to file. The Clerk is to unseal all filings in this case. Mailed notice

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2