2025-cv-12728

COMPLAINT filed by ShinStar LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24215022.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff ShinStar LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff ShinStar LLC Exhibit 3 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1]

MOTION by Plaintiff ShinStar LLC for leave to file under seal

CIVIL Cover Sheet

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by ShinStar LLC

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by ShinStar LLC

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ShinStar LLC by Justin R. Gaudio

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ShinStar LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ShinStar LLC by Trevor Christian Talhami

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ShinStar LLC by Madeline Halgren

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category Two).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

AMENDED complaint by ShinStar LLC against SKYLINE-USA and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff ShinStar LLC Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint[15]

Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Under Seal [4] by ShinStar LLC

MOTION by Plaintiff ShinStar LLC for discovery Expedited

Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff ShinStar LLC for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by ShinStar LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[19]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[20]

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to proceed under seal, [4], is denied. Proceeding under seal is extraordinary. Plaintiff has not identified circumstances warranting such extraordinary relief. See generally Eicher Motors Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 25-CV-02937, 2025 WL 2299593 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025). Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery, [18], is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defendant, or in connection with the Defendant Internet Store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Temu, LLC ("Temu") (the "Third Party Providers"), shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. Plaintiff's motion for service by email and publication, [19], is denied. Plaintiff must first attempt means of service "by any internationally agreed means. that is reasonably calculated to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1); see also Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 317 (1950). If there is no internationally agreed means, Plaintiff shall attempt service by the means specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(2). If those means fail, Plaintiff may inform the court and petition this court again for permission to serve process via "other means not prohibited by international agreement." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Plaintiff should file a status report by 12/15/2025.