|
# |
Date |
Document |
|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
COMPLAINT filed by Fendi S.R.L.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24268629. Exhibit 1 to the Complaint Exhibit 2 to the Complaint Exhibit 3 to the Complaint (Exhibit 4 to the Complaint) |
|
2 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
3 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. by Paul Joseph Kossof |
|
4 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Fendi S.R.L. |
|
5 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Fendi S.R.L. |
|
6 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
Trademark Report by Fendi S.R.L. |
|
7 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
DECLARATION of Paul Kossof Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Paul Kossof Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Paul Kossof (Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Paul Kossof) |
|
8 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. to seal Schedule A, Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert, and Plaintiffs Memorandum Establishing That Joinder Is Proper |
|
9 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. Schedule A |
|
10 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
DECLARATION of Nicolas Lambert (Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert) |
|
11 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert |
|
12 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. Plaintiff's Memorandum Establishing that Joinder is Proper |
|
13 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L.for electronic service of process. Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion for Electronic Service Declaration of Paul Kossof in Support of Motion for Electronic Service Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Paul Kossof in Support of Motion for Electronic Service (Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Paul Kossof in Support of Motion for Electronic Service) CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
14 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. for temporary restraining order (Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order) |
|
15 |
Oct. 29, 2025 |
NOTICE of Motion by Paul Joseph Kossof for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order 14, motion to seal 8, motion for miscellaneous relief, 13 before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 11/4/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
|
16 |
Oct. 30, 2025 |
MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Exhibits) |
|
17 |
Oct. 30, 2025 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. |
|
18 |
Nov. 3, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's ex parte motions 8 13 14 are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. The court finds that security in the amount of $8,000--$1,000 per defendant--is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Motion hearing set for 11/4/25 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
|
19 |
Nov. 4, 2025 |
SEALED TEMPORARY Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 11/4/2025. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
|
23 |
Nov. 7, 2025 |
Preliminary Injunction |
|
27 |
Nov. 13, 2025 |
Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
|
28 |
Nov. 13, 2025 |
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 11/13/2025. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |